<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interacting with Print</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lieslbarrell.com/interacting-with-print/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lieslbarrell.com/interacting-with-print/</link>
	<description>Technology, Intermedia and World Wide Wonder</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 02:34:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liesl</title>
		<link>http://www.lieslbarrell.com/interacting-with-print/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Liesl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 23:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lieslbarrell.com/?p=243#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Hey Sophelia,

Thanks! I was chuckling about the poster for days...

Academics taking a current paradigm (e.g. digital) and borrowing its break-out language for the old (e.g. print) in a bid for relevance is a time-honoured Ivory Tower comedy tradition. 

It is just as sacred as the &lt;a href=&quot;http://finance.yahoo.com/career-work/article/108433/the-most-painfully-annoying-business-jargon?mod=career-leadership&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;corporate gobbledegook clichés&lt;/a&gt; you clearly know and love, although the anachronistic bid for funding makes them just a tad more earnest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Sophelia,</p>
<p>Thanks! I was chuckling about the poster for days&#8230;</p>
<p>Academics taking a current paradigm (e.g. digital) and borrowing its break-out language for the old (e.g. print) in a bid for relevance is a time-honoured Ivory Tower comedy tradition. </p>
<p>It is just as sacred as the <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/career-work/article/108433/the-most-painfully-annoying-business-jargon?mod=career-leadership" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">corporate gobbledegook clichés</a> you clearly know and love, although the anachronistic bid for funding makes them just a tad more earnest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sophelia</title>
		<link>http://www.lieslbarrell.com/interacting-with-print/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Sophelia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 19:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lieslbarrell.com/?p=243#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Holy crap is ‘interacting with print’ funny. That’s right up there with ‘engaging with customers’ and being ‘committed to providing quality service’ on my list of phrases that do less where good language would do more. Very saddening, however, to see it in academia when I was hoping it was limited to the corporate world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holy crap is ‘interacting with print’ funny. That’s right up there with ‘engaging with customers’ and being ‘committed to providing quality service’ on my list of phrases that do less where good language would do more. Very saddening, however, to see it in academia when I was hoping it was limited to the corporate world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

