<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Not &#8220;The Arts&#8221;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lieslbarrell.com/why-not-the-arts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lieslbarrell.com/why-not-the-arts/</link>
	<description>Technology, Intermedia and World Wide Wonder</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 02:34:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.lieslbarrell.com/why-not-the-arts/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 18:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http:/?p=1#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Angela: I didn&#039;t know that was officially part of their hiring strategy, it speaks volumes for how important a broad, analytical, research-friendly and engaged education is for innovators. It&#039;s interesting to see how the education system is trying to cope with advances in web technology &amp; culture, I know the journalism program here at Concordia is trying to incorporate more of a focus on online content, but that graduates are still struggling to adapt without taking a lot on themselves (which is the ultimate point of education, I guess).

Jamie: Well-played... Well-played. Although it was missing a reference to Cuddy&#039;s rack and/or backside... BTW, did you see the &lt;a href=&quot;http://failblog.org/2009/12/09/closed-caption-fail-2/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;House cameo on the Fail blog&lt;/a&gt;? Classic!

Oh, and you aren&#039;t selling out by studying screenwriting. Whatever you end up doing, being able to craft what is essentially a brief/blueprint/functional requirements document adeptly will ALWAYS serve you well. Whether you&#039;re making movies, viral spots or taking over the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Angela: I didn&#8217;t know that was officially part of their hiring strategy, it speaks volumes for how important a broad, analytical, research-friendly and engaged education is for innovators. It&#8217;s interesting to see how the education system is trying to cope with advances in web technology &#038; culture, I know the journalism program here at Concordia is trying to incorporate more of a focus on online content, but that graduates are still struggling to adapt without taking a lot on themselves (which is the ultimate point of education, I guess).</p>
<p>Jamie: Well-played&#8230; Well-played. Although it was missing a reference to Cuddy&#8217;s rack and/or backside&#8230; BTW, did you see the <a href="http://failblog.org/2009/12/09/closed-caption-fail-2/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">House cameo on the Fail blog</a>? Classic!</p>
<p>Oh, and you aren&#8217;t selling out by studying screenwriting. Whatever you end up doing, being able to craft what is essentially a brief/blueprint/functional requirements document adeptly will ALWAYS serve you well. Whether you&#8217;re making movies, viral spots or taking over the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie</title>
		<link>http://www.lieslbarrell.com/why-not-the-arts/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 08:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http:/?p=1#comment-6</guid>
		<description>House: Cuddy thinks it’s idiopathic. “Cuddy” and “idiop” being the relevant parts of that sentence.
Chase: Well I’d say TB, but Cuddy’s already ruled it out.
House: And you’d be just as big an idiop as her.

although I do feel like i&#039;m vaguely selling out becoming a screenwriter. thoughts? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>House: Cuddy thinks it’s idiopathic. “Cuddy” and “idiop” being the relevant parts of that sentence.<br />
Chase: Well I’d say TB, but Cuddy’s already ruled it out.<br />
House: And you’d be just as big an idiop as her.</p>
<p>although I do feel like i&#8217;m vaguely selling out becoming a screenwriter. thoughts? <img src='http://www.lieslbarrell.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angela</title>
		<link>http://www.lieslbarrell.com/why-not-the-arts/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Angela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 01:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http:/?p=1#comment-2</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t say I disagree with you...before Google went public they were specifically looking for web marketing candidates with degrees in the Humanities instead of an MSc in marketing (whatever that means...how you can academically teach something that changes so much, I don&#039;t know)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t say I disagree with you&#8230;before Google went public they were specifically looking for web marketing candidates with degrees in the Humanities instead of an MSc in marketing (whatever that means&#8230;how you can academically teach something that changes so much, I don&#8217;t know)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

